Hi,
Â
I measured it with iperf now, in exactly the same way like the guy in the link you posted.
I get just a little bit more speed than 1Gbit, but not really significantly.
Both clients are on the same vSwitch and same ip subnet (so they never pass an external link, which might have limited it to 1 Gbit):
Â
Â
C:\Users\admin\Desktop\iperf-2.0.5-2-win32>iperf.exe -w 1500k -l 512M -t 30 -c 10.21.1.4
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 10.21.1.4, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 1.46 MByte
------------------------------------------------------------
[Â 3] local 10.21.1.27 port 56508 connected with 10.21.1.4 port 5001
[ ID] Interval      Transfer    Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-34.8 sec 5.00 GBytes 1.23 Gbits/sec
Â
C:\Users\admin\Desktop\iperf-2.0.5-2-win32>ipconfig
Â
Windows-IP-Konfiguration
Â
Ethernet-Adapter LAN-Verbindung:
Â
  Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix:
  IPv4-Adresse . . . . . . . . . . : 10.21.1.27
  Subnetzmaske . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.128.0
  Standardgateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.21.127.254
Â
...
But you are right. Its more than a GBit. Possibly with the same vNIC under Linux its even more, i didnt test that yet.
Â
So, to come back to my original question:
Do you think its basically a good or bad idea to aggregate several vNICs to lets say 2 or 3 GBit Interfaces?
Â
Thx in advance
ND.